QUANTUM WARFARE OVERVIEW: (04/11/2024)

Quantum computing stands on the precipice of revolutionizing our technological landscape, promising unparalleled advances in simulations and encryption. However, with this potential comes a host of challenges and threats that must be carefully considered. 

One of the most significant threats of quantum computing lies in ets ability to render current encryption methods obsolete. Traditional cryptographic systems rely on the difficulty of certain mathematical problems for security, such as factoring large numbers. Quantum computers, with their ability to perform calculations at exponential speeds through the principles of superposition and entanglement, could effectively break these encryption algorithms. This poses a grave risk to sensitive information stored online, including financial data, personal communications, and government secrets such as nuclear launch codes. The advent of quantum-resistant cryptography is essential to mitigate this threat and ensure the security of digital infrastructure in the quantum era.

The race for quantum supremacy among global superpowers has intensified in recent years, with significant investments being made in research and development. The ability to harness quantum technology for purposes such as cryptography, code-breaking, and optimization could tip the balance of power in international relations. Moreover, the potential for quantum-enabled weapons systems, including secure communication networks and precision-guided munitions, raises concerns about the escalation of conflict in the digital age. Establishing norms and regulations to govern the use of quantum technology in military applications will be essential to prevent unintended consequences and maintain strategic stability.

QUANTUM GENERATED CONSIOUSNESS' & OVERLAPPING OF QUANTA;

Quantum computing has the potential to revolutionize fields such as artificial intelligence and machine learning and will revolutionise our concepts and understanding of what consciousness fundamentally is; and we will very soon begin to model consciousness inside quantum simulations to the degree where they are as realistic as real life. The individual human mind that is having his or her consciousness modelled inside the quantumly generated simulation or Quantum Space Bubble (QSB), can sometimes experience interference from their quantumly generated mirror version of their consciousness and this echo effect can work beyond space and time, due to the nature of mirror neurons and biocentrism's definition of the true nature of reality, which suggests consciousness is a fundamental building block of reality and that our perception of time as being linear is deeply flawed. Our concept of time being chronological is simply a pattern that our consciousness' are picking through the sea of quantifiable moments of experience. You would like to think that we choose our routes through the sea of static, which consists of all possible moments of consciousness that may or may not have happened, and by us moving through that sea of pixes, choosing variables by consciously observing them and leaving other variables, variables that are physically possible but not experienced, as ghosts.

QUANTUM FUTURE;

While this presents exciting opportunities for innovation and discovery, et also raises concerns about the implications for privacy, autonomy and there are many ethical issues regarding simulating consciousness in particular, not merely due to the vast differences in how time can be manipulated inside a quantumly generated version of an original consciousness, that has been so well modelled that aspects of the quantumly generated consciousness begin to overlap with the biological original consciousness that is being modelled, as moments of quantifiable consciousness that exist in the true nature of reality according to Biocentrism, can overlap when the quantumly generated consciousness is perfectly mirroring the original.

QUANTUM CAPABILITIES;

This same capability can also be exploited for mass surveillance and manipulation, eroding individual privacy rights and exacerbating existing inequalities.

Quantum algorithms could vastly accelerate the process of data analysis and pattern recognition, leading to unprecedented insights into human behaviour and preferences and can even simulate consciousness to a level that may interfere with the original consciousness that the simulation is being based upon or scanned from.

Placing these machines in craters on the dark side of the moon is highly logical and this is where our most powerful machines exist for they are shielded from electrons from the sun which interfere with the qubits and cause disturbances. With the quantum machines based here, their calculations can get so incredibly complex, once shielded from disturbances from radiation, that they can simulate consciousness to a level that can actually interfere with the original consciousness that they are modelling.

One example of a quantum computer predicting a future combat scenario for example is as follows;

Satellite scans have shown a build up of enemy forces inside a city, and using this telemetry coupled with surveillance and reconnaissance elements, we can count their numbers, weapons and armour as we can easily see through all buildings and walls etc with modern day satellite capabilities. This data, i.e. the locations of enemy combatants and weapons/armour is then loaded into a map of the city that is scanned in from satellites and reconnaissance drones, and the quantum computer then runs simulations of the combat scenario unfolding as if this were a computer game and over time different strategies can be applied to see what works and what doesn't on a basic level. Obviously, the more powerful the computer and the simpler the scenario and battle, i.e. the less combatants and the smaller the battlefield, the more accurate the simulation will be.

Some variables/realities aka possible futures that are modelled by the quantum computers can be shut down by moving away from the timeline or scenario that is being modelled. For example if a quantum simulation shows that a particular planet is habitable, then we can blow up that planet and sterilise the planet of any potential xenos threats before then colonising and settling upon that planet, and that removes that variable from the threat equation and allows our computational resources to be better spent elsewhere. 

In other scenarios, we may model and predict and incoming threat to our species survival using quantum simulations, i.e. perhaps simulations show that a specific individual is going to be a threat in the future, and therefore efforts are made to assassinate that individual, however, the quantum sim should also predict what will happen if such action is taken place and take into account your response to the quantum computers predictions within et's predictions. There is no point averting disaster by avoiding a quantum prediction and killing a terrorist for example, if by doing so you just generate a new scenario with new threats that may or not be easier then the previous one to predict. What I'm trying to say, is that when analysing and changing your behaviour due to quantum simulations showing you threats, you musts model into the quantum computer the fact that you are changing your behaviour based upon the sim that you are being shown, so that too can be modelled.

There is no point for example in assassinating a terrorist after modelling that they are going to try and blow up MI5 quarters in Battersea for example, when doing so causes an even greater problem - say his friends continue his plan instead. You need to model your response to a scenario into the quantum simulation. If you intervene and kill the terrorist, and then kill his accomplices, as the second simulation shows that his accomplices will strike in his stead, and you now find that a third quantum simulation shows an even worse scenario, i.e. an insurrection forming, then you should take that into consideration when modelling the predictions - i.e. you need to model your response to the prediction into the prediction.

With each subsequent simulation that involves your own response and interventions based upon the previous prediction, the quantum simulation and prediction becomes inherently less reliable as more variables are being built up so an error in the first simulation will extrapolate to the second and create even more entropy by the time the third simulation is modelled.

If you model that killing the terrorist and then killing his friends that the second simulation predicted will happen due to your intervention based upon knowledge gathered from the first sim, and you now conversely find that a third simulation shows something ideal happening, then there is now pressure to follow through and kill the terrorist and then kill his accomplices, which the first and second sims showed respectively, as by not intervening by killing the original terrorist, the second simulation involving his accomplices becoming riled after his death now becomes irrelevant as that simulation was modelling a scenario where you intervened.

If the quantum computer hasn't modelled your response to the assassination, then your response / intervention may just generate a larger problem, as with each intervention that needs to be modelled based upon reactions of the observer to the original prediction, the less accurate things become.

If you are shown a prediction of the future by a quantum computer, then changing your behaviour to avoid that prediction just renders that prediction invalid, so you need to incorporate your reaction to viewing the the prediction into the prediction etself or else nothing will be accurate.

If I see a quantum variation saying I will die tomorrow if I get a certain train for example, I will naturally change my behaviour as a result and drive instead, yet this conscious decision may render the prediction irrelevant in the first place, and may even stop the train from being blown up in the first instance, yet something worse, or indeed better may happen as a result. Either way, to have truly accurate predictions of the future using quantum simulations, then the beings or entities involved in the simulations need to be unaware that their fate has been predicted less they change behaviour and ruin the prediction, or they must be un-carring so as to head towards their fate and destiny regardless of the fact a quantum computer has predicted that - or, if a quantum computer can simulate a variation of the future that includes your reaction to the very simulation that the computer is modelling as part of that model, then you may actually get somewhere.

.<div class="x11i5rnm xat2Big brains you see MI5 and 4cr x1mh8g0r x1vvkbs xtlvy1s x126k92a">